Home   Contact us   Terms of use
SEARCH: Advanced Search
-
THE RTMA Main Header Banner
-
 MEMBERS <->  EVENTS <->  RESOURCES <->  DISCUSSION <->  RESEARCH <->  ABOUT THE RTMA
SPONSORS

VIA
Co-founders of the RTMA.

RTMA NEWSLETTER

If you would like to receive regular news of RTMA events and activities, please click on the subscribe button below.
SUBSCRIBE
Should Channel Management be a CXO role?
Yes, it should rank alongside Marketing & Sales
No, It should be part of the CMO/Marketing Director's role
No, it should be part of the CSO/Sales director's role
No, it cuts across all functions
SUBMIT
Poll results
Poll archive
ROUTES TO MARKET

KILLING THREE ROUTES TO MARKET MYTHS
We review a book which challenges much of the received wisdom in routes to market, including the three myths behind most RTM strategies. Managing Business Relationships should be compulsory reading for anyone active in the field.
Author: Max Hotopf | Editor the Routes to Market Journal
Email: max@the-rtma.com

Rating: 4.7 / 5 | Rate this article

SAVE Save PRINT Print EMAIL Email DISCUSS Discuss


Completely rewritten for this, its second, edition, Managing Business Relationships is a précis of the three decades of research carried out by Industrial Marketing and Purchasing Group, an international network of academics. 

The authors start by exploding three myths.  The first is the myth of action.  They attack the notion that marketing is something that manufacturers do and involves targeting a segmented group of faceless, passive consumers.  They argue that, in fact, business buyers actively source solutions, that they are not looking for products from manufacturers and that customers vary widely in how they behave and what they do.

The myth of action is the idea that a company can act independently.  IMP believes that companies are defined by their relationships with other companies, be they suppliers, intermediaries or customers.  You have to understand the position you occupy in this lattice before you can make sense of the world. 

The myth of completeness holds that a company can develop a strategy based on its own resources and skills.  IMP believes strategy has to involve the resources of those with whom the company interacts and on whom it depends.  It claims that core competencies these days are typically based on a network of relationships.

So what is the network?  Quite simply, it covers every company with which yours has a direct or an indirect relationship.  And, these days, terms such as "manufacturer" or "distributor" are meaningless.  If Ford buys in 70% of what it resells, is it not a distributor? Even terms like "distribution channel" and "supply chain" are erroneous, because they imply an artificial definition of upstream or downstream based on your own position.

So what comes out of all this?  The book presents a series of network paradoxes, based on the observation that, if a company is defined by its network of relationships, then the network is both a source of freedom and a cage.  Your position gives you strength, but you cannot alter it easily.  To make change you have to work with others in the network.

It also redefines technology as something that provides a solution for a customer. 


1 | 2 | Next

Related Articles
How to measure and master mindshare
Max Hotopf
Winning Partner Mindshare
Max Hotopf
Making a multi-channel strategy work
Max Hotopf
The long view
Julian Dent
Louis Stern, Kellogg School of Management: Dealing with justice
Max Hotopf




Apply now

Executive education
Check out INSEAD's new program on distribution channel management
Read more...
-
The Routes to Market Journal
The quarterly channel management Journal
Read more...
-
-----
© 2008 The Routes to Market Association // Tel: +44 (0) 20 7585 3399 // Fax: +44 (0) 20 7924 5284 // Email: info@the-rtma.com
-----
Registered number 3579985 England //
The Routes to Market Association, 4th Floor, Sterling House, Great Eastern Wharf, Parkgate Road, London SW11 4NQ //
Site powered by WORKSsitebuilder